News Roundup 1V05
She’s got a point:
In an interview on Thursday, Mrs. Clinton called Admiral Jacoby’s statement “the first confirmation, publicly, by the administration that the North Koreans have the ability to arm a missile with a nuclear device that can reach the United States,” adding, “Put simply, they couldn’t do that when George Bush became president, and now they can.”*
Unfortunately, that’s very true. At the beginning, when we first found out that the North Koreans had been reneging on our deal and secretly developing nuclear weapons, it was fair to blame Clinton, Albright, and all the other appeasement lackeys. Now, however, we are into the fifth year of the Bush Administration, and absolutely nothing has been done to address the situation.
Sure, we can point out that no other country (besides Japan) seems to care either, and that they would be opposed to force of any kind. Yes, the options are all bad. But none of that erases the fact that in the second Bush administration, that tyrannical little dictator finally developed the theoretical, if not actual, capability to reach the United States with a nuclear weapon. Suck.
—–
This, ladies and gentlemen, is our illustrious Senate, the greatest deliberative body in the world:
While a filibuster would seem to be more taxing on the side doing the talking, that isn’t necessarily the case. The filibusterers need only one person in the Senate chamber at any one time, prattling away. The other side must make sure a quorum—a majority of all senators—is on hand, a constitutional requirement for the Senate to conduct business. If there’s no quorum after a senator has demanded a quorum call, the Senate must adjourn, giving those leading the filibuster time to go home, sleep, and delay things even more. To ensure a quorum during the rancorous civil rights filibusters [by Democrats], cots were set up in Senate anterooms, and majority senators presented themselves in bathrobes during early-morning quorum calls.*
This is nothing less than an institutionalized temper-tantrum. The requirement of a super majority to end debate should ensure that discussion does not close before everyone has had their say. It should not be used as a back door to raise the number of votes required to approve the matter at hand.
—–
I don’t even know where to begin on this one:
In a letter posted on its Web site the head of the white supremacist group Aryan Nations offers his thanks to radical Islamic terrorists and extends the group’s hand of friendship.
…
“I offer my most sincere best-wishes to those who wage holy Jihad against the infrastructure of the decadent, weak and Judaic-influenced societal infrastructure of the West. I send a message of thanks and well-wishes to the methods and works of groups on the Islamic front against the jew such as Al-Qaeda and Sheik Usama Bin Ladin, Hamas, Islamic Jihad, Hezbollah and to all Jihadis worldwide who fight for the glory of the Khilafah and the downfall of the anti-life and anti-freedom System prevalent on this earth today. … I ask our Islamic fellow fighters against jewry to remember the co-operation between Mufti Haj Mohammad Amin al-Husseini and Reichsfuhrer Heinrich Himmler during the last century and to remember that all that is of the past it is our duty to surpass!”*
Idiots, on so many levels. Maybe I shouldn’t even try to pursue this logically, but do they really think that the system set up in the aftermath of the Jihadis will be “pro-life” and “pro-freedom?” And aren’t these people supposed to be White Supremacists? How can they justify allying with Arabs? Especially against Jews, who are much more White, both in terms of color and culture, than Arabs. (Yes, even the Sephardic ones)
—–
I think they got this backwards:
The Army is preparing to issue a new interrogations manual that expressly bars the harsh techniques disclosed in the Abu Ghraib prisoner abuse scandal, and incorporates safeguards devised to prevent such misconduct at military prison camps in the future, Army officials said Wednesday.
…
Mr. Gandy said the new manual barred interrogators and other intelligence officials from posing as medics, journalists or chaplains to gain information from detainees. But they are allowed to use ruses, like falsely promising to free a captive in exchange for information, he said.*
I would contend that it’s much better to allow impersonation of medics, journalists, and chaplains, and forbid false agreements. If the detainees know that any given promise may be fake, they would not be likely to agree to any agreement. As bad as it may seem, offering deals to small fish in order to fry big fish is a time tested and honored tradition. It works, and anything that degrades its persuasiveness should be discouraged. By contrast, what real harm is done by impersonating those other people. A “chilling effect” on discussions with real medics, journalists, and chaplains? Oh well, those people probably don’t relay the information to intelligence officials anyways, so the net loss, if any, would be minimal.

